print u"\u001b[34m E \u001b[35m F \u001b[36m G \u001b[37m H \u001b[0m"
During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
，这一点在体育直播中也有详细论述
王顺听从对接人员的安排，在家中用摄像头对准电子钟。右图为数字人主播在直播间里的画面。 受访者供图，推荐阅读币安_币安注册_币安下载获取更多信息
Что думаешь? Оцени!。体育直播是该领域的重要参考