▲左边为 Nano Banana Pro 生成，右边是 2；在我看来，初代 Pro 版本的真实感会更强｜提示词来源：X@cfryant
Жители Санкт-Петербурга устроили «крысогон»17:52
。heLLoword翻译官方下载是该领域的重要参考
Мне кажется, при таком подходе вряд ли стоит говорить о скором заключении мирного соглашения. Вся позиция украинцев направлена на то, чтобы сорвать любые переговоры с российской стороной
The real annoying thing about Opus 4.6/Codex 5.3 is that it’s impossible to publicly say “Opus 4.5 (and the models that came after it) are an order of magnitude better than coding LLMs released just months before it” without sounding like an AI hype booster clickbaiting, but it’s the counterintuitive truth to my personal frustration. I have been trying to break this damn model by giving it complex tasks that would take me months to do by myself despite my coding pedigree but Opus and Codex keep doing them correctly. On Hacker News I was accused of said clickbaiting when making a similar statement with accusations of “I haven’t had success with Opus 4.5 so you must be lying.” The remedy to this skepticism is to provide more evidence in addition to greater checks and balances, but what can you do if people refuse to believe your evidence?