Please correct the following errors:
人 民 网 版 权 所 有 ，未 经 书 面 授 权 禁 止 使 用
。新收录的资料对此有专业解读
During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Recent flood events are not only having an immediate effect on wildlife, but also future reproduction
謝特勒–瓊斯指出，中國也可能藉此「觀察風向」，了解特朗普將如何回應其他潛在引爆點，例如中國宣稱擁有主權但實施自治的台灣。